| SITUATION IN HEADLINES |
| I work as a business consultant helping to create companies. |
| At the beginning of my career I was involved in the creation of the company that I knew would grow rapidly and would make a great deal of money. I was offered a 10% share in the company but I rejected this as I did not want the money that this would bring as it would disrupt my life pattern. |
| That I didn’t get the money from having the shares, and not minding, made me realise that having a lot of money is not important to me. |
| The three other creators of the company went on to make a lot of money. Their financial success has had a negative impact on both of their lives, as they have not been able to repeat the success financially, and one of the three has even taken over companies and turned them from success to disaster. The wealth has also negatively affected their personal lives as they have become alienated from the friends and relatives. Marriages have even been destroyed. |
| When I work I am asked to take a small share in companies I help create, and several companies that I have a small share in are likely to be floated on the stockmarket soon. |
| The one that is likely to happen soonest I have a 1% stake in and it is likely to float for about £200 million making me a millionaire – completely outside my control. |
Michael was worried about the money that was
coming his way and the changes that it would bring. Although someone who is
not normally anxious he felt this anxiety very strongly but was unable to locate
where this anxiety precisely lay. He suggested that it might be to do with factors
such as the responsibility that came with so much money and using it well, with
the possibility of his life pattern (of a wife and friends, and doing a job
he enjoyed) being disrupted and with being seen differently by people around
him. Part of the problem surrounding this issue was Michael’s view of himself
as someone who is ethical and not driven by money and traditionally ‘capitalist’
considerations and the possibility that he would become a millionaire - how
would he and other people view this possible contradiction.
Although anxious, or perhaps because he was
anxious, he had put off thinking much about what to do. He did tentatively suggest
the options of giving away the shares before he received the money, or waiting
for the shares to realise and investing some of the money in a pension, and
putting some in a charitable trust. He was concerned that while giving the money
away might do some good it was also a way for him avoiding the issue of what
to do with the money, as even if he gave it away somebody would have to decide
what to do with it, and he wanted to make sure the money was put to good use.
| VALUE | WEIGHT |
| Not being thought by self or others as hypocritical/ challenged about own ethical conduct | 10 |
| Duty to do something constructive with the money | 10 |
| Acting within your own competence | 10 |
| Preserving current lifestyle and relationships | 10 |
| Provide opportunities to others | 10 |
| Duty to write the book | 10 |
| Not harming others (especially through financial mismanagement) | 9 |
| Doing current work (accountancy/ starting companies) | 8 |
| Knowing what you are trying to achieve/ knowing who you are | 8 |
| Financial responsibility to family (to provide security) | 7-8 |
| Doing things for self (as we saw above Michael needed something to be a duty to others before he would do it – hence the low score) | 3 |
| Having more money than I need | 2 |
Michael’s analysis of these values went to considerably reduce his anxiety about
what the affects of getting the money could be. In fact many of these values
were uncovered through Michael’s analysis of what had gone wrong in the lives
of his three former partners who had become millionaires. These partners had
not done anything constructive with the money they had realised, as they did
not know who they were and what they were trying to achieve, they did not act
within their competence and consequently they had harmed others through their
financial mismanagement, and furthermore they damaged their relationships and
current lifestyle.
We then generated possible options for Michael
coming up with these ideas:
| OPTIONS |
| Using the money to get time to write book |
| Putting the money in a pension fund |
| Giving to a charity/ charities |
| Setting up a foundation to promote his economic ideas |
| Financing a chair in economics to promote his economic ideas |
| Investing the money ethically (for instance in micro-credit, social housing and so on) |
| Continuing to work as currently |
In analyzing these options it became clear that one of things worrying Michael was that he would become swamped by the demands of sorting out the use of the money in any organizations that might be set up. However it also became clear that Michael very much enjoyed working as a team player and was happy to devolve responsibility to others. This being so many of these options could be pursued without Michael being solely in charge, and another source of anxiety was reduced.
Given that Michael would not need to be in
complete control of whatever he set up it also became clear that these options
were not mutually exclusive. Michael rejected the possibility of setting up
a chair as 'not really him' and was drawn towards trying to finish writing his
book and then, if this took off, setting up a foundation. Meanwhile he thought
he would invest the money ethically, as this would provide a good use for it
and also keep it available should he get into the position of setting up the
foundation. He would continue working as he presently does and invest some for
a pension.
In the analysis it seemed that Michael had produced a potential win-win option
that would capture much of what he valued. Now it was time to test whether this
option really was in accordance with his values
(
|
ASSESS OPTIONS
|
|||
|
Writing book, investing money ethically, setting up foundation, continuing to do same work as presently, investing some in a pension fund | ||
| Not being thought by self or others as hypocritical/ challenged about own ethical conduct | 2 not sure how self and others view both challenging and using the economic system |
||
| Duty to do something constructive with the money | 5 these options are a wise constructive use of the money |
||
| Acting within your own competence | 5 I am very good at setting things going its my job after all and would be competent at these things |
||
| Preserving current lifestyle and relationships | 5 and 2 My life with my wife will not change but there is some doubt about how this might affect relationships with friends |
||
| Provide Opportunities to Others | 5 The ethical investment will provide opportunities to others, as will the book and foundation |
||
| Duty to Write the Book | 5 I’m writing the book! |
||
| Not harming others (especially through financial mismanagement) | 5 As above for acting within competence |
||
| Not having more money than I need | 5 I will be using most of the money on a variety of useful projects rather than keeping it for my personal use |
||
| Doing current work (accountancy/ starting companies) | 4 My pattern of work is likely to change, at least to some extent, in the future. But writing the book is not likely to lead to my not being employed to set up companies as many people setting up companies might well share my views about what is valuable. Anyway I will still be recognised as good at it. |
||
| Knowing what you are trying to achieve/ knowing who you are | 4 These options are part of who I am, and what I want to achieve |
||
| Financial responsibility to family (to provide security) | 4 As some of the money will be invested in a pension fund and I will continue to work anyway |
||
| Doing things for self (as we saw above Michael needed something to be a duty to others before he would do it - hence the low score) | 2 In a sense writing the book is doing something for self, but doing things for self is given a very low priority |
||
Checking this option against the values showed
that this option captured much of what Michael saw as important in his life.
However a couple of the values were recorded with question marks by them. These
were areas that Michael resolved that he would prepare himself for over the
coming weeks and months. This is how he saw it:
Michael had partly put off doing more on the book because he tended to work when he saw himself as having a duty to work, which was when he was contracted by people to help them to set up their companies. While he did believe he had a duty to write the book he also found it difficult to allow himself the time to do this. Michael resolved at the end of the session to work to give his own projects a higher value, and even decided that if the company was not floated on the stockmarket he would try to find more time to devote to the book for, as he pointed out, many people wrote books in more difficult circumstances.
Another remaining area of worry was how the
money might lead to changes in relationships with friends. Michael thought that
on reflection this might not be too much of a problem with the friends that
he and his wife had but he would also prepare himself for possible difficulties.
The final remaining area of worry was how
he and others would view him as both criticising the economic system and benefiting
from it. Michael decided that he would put some work into trying to reconcile
his views about this.
At the end of the session Michael’s anxiety about the changes to his life that the money would bring were reduced and he had become much more committed to writing a book that he thought might have a chance to change the world for the better. Michael said that he found himself much better able to prepare for the future as he had now become aware of the sorts of factors that might change in his life, and he had ideas for how he wanted to manage these changes. In broadening his view of the problem facing him, working out the values that he wanted to live by, and finding options to realise these values, he had come to see that he could work to avoid the negative consequences that happened to his former partners and instead aim to devote more time to realising his worthwhile projects and making good use of the money. By making wise use of the good fortune that would come his way Michael would have a chance to make a significant impact on changing the world for the better.
* Details have been changed to preserve the privacy
of 'Michael'. This case comes from a decision-making workshop
|
This material is copyright © PROGRESS
(2001/2002)
You are free to use it as long as you acknowledge the source and let us know Please provide us feedback as we are constantly assessing effectiveness |
PROGRESS is developed by David Arnaud, Tim LeBon, Antonia Macaro
For further help or to arrange training for your organisation email PROGRESS@www.decision-making.co.uk
|
|
copyright: © working webs(2001/2002)
|
page last updated: 10/11/2004
|
contact: webmaster
|